These specimens (AMNH 16951, 30709, 30711–30714, 133119, 133120, 136163, 136167–136169, 139221; KU 120233, 120245, 123943) so closely resemble the type of P. canus and other referred material from eastern Peru that we could not find any phenotypic basis for retaining mondolfii even as a subspecies.
--Leptictidium (discusión) 14:34 10 jul 2018 (UTC)Responder
