Diferencia entre revisiones de «HTML»

<ref name="raymond">{{cita libro| url = http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/| urlcapítulo = http://www.faqs.org/docs/artu/ietf_process.html|título=[[The Art of Unix Programming]]|apellidos=Raymond|nombre=Eric|capítulo=IETF and the RFC Standards Process|cita=In IETF tradition, standards have to arise from experience with a working prototype implementation — but once they become standards, code that does not conform to them is considered broken and mercilessly scrapped. …Internet-Drafts are not specifications, and software implementers and vendors are specifically barred from claiming compliance with them as if they were specifications. Internet-Drafts are focal points for discussion, usually in a working group… Once an Internet-Draft has been published with an RFC number, it is a specification to which implementers may claim conformance. It is expected that the authors of the RFC and the community at large will begin correcting the specification with field experience.}}</ref>

Similarmente, el boceto competidor de Dave Raggett ''HTML+ (Hypertext Markup Format)'' (Formato de marcaje de hipertexto), de 1993 tardío, sugería, estandarizar características ya implementadas tales como tablas.<ref name=raggett>{{Cita web|url=https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/idindex.cgi?command=id_detail&id=789|título=HTML+ Internet-Draft - Abstract|cita=Browser writers are experimenting with extensions to HTML and it is now appropriate to draw these ideas together into a revised document format. The new format is designed to allow a gradual roll over from HTML, adding features like tables, captioned figures and fill-out forms for querying remote databases or mailing questionnaires.}}</ref>

 

== Marcado HTML ==