Diferencia entre revisiones de «Socialismo libertario»
Contenido eliminado Contenido añadido
Sin resumen de edición |
Sin resumen de edición |
||
Línea 1:
El '''socialismo libertario''' (a veces también llamado '''[[anarquismo social]]''',<ref name="Ostergaard 1991. p. 21">[[Geoffrey Ostergaard|Ostergaard, Geoffrey]]. "Anarchism". ''A Dictionary of Marxist Thought''. Blackwell Publishing, 1991. p. 21.</ref><ref name="Noam Chomsky 2004, p. 739">Chomsky, Noam (2004). ''Language and Politics''. In Otero, Carlos Peregrín. AK Press. p. 739</ref> '''[[libertarismo de izquierda]]'''<ref>Bookchin, Murray and Janet Biehl. ''The Murray Bookchin Reader''. Cassell, 1997. p. 170 ISBN 0-304-33873-7</ref><ref>Hicks, Steven V. and Daniel E. Shannon. ''The American journal of economics and sociolology''. Blackwell Pub, 2003. p. 612</ref> y "'''libertarismo socialista'''"<ref>Miller, Wilbur R. (2012). The social history of crime and punishment in America. An encyclopedia. 5 vols. London: Sage Publications. p. 1007. ISBN 1412988764. "There exist three major camps in libertarian thought: right-libertarianism, socialist libertarianism, and ..."</ref>es un grupo de filosofías políticas que promueven una sociedad no-jerárquica, no-burocrática, sin Estado y sin propiedad privada en los medios de producción, que se opone a todas las formas coercitivas de organización social, promoviendo la [[libre asociación]] en lugar de un Gobierno, y oponiéndose a lo que califica como relaciones sociales coercitivas del capitalismo tal como la [[Salario|relación salarial]].<ref>Tal como observa el socialista libertario [[Noam Chomsky]], un consistente libertario ''«debe oponerse a la propiedad privada de los medios de producción y a la [[esclavitud del salario]], los cuales son componentes de este sistema, y son incompatibles con el principio de que el trabajo debe ser realizado libremente y bajo control del productor»''. Chomsky, Noam. Otero, Carlos. ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=Y75K660UfzsC&pg=PA26&vq=%22a+consistent+libertarian%22&source=gbs_search_r&cad=1_1&sig=ACfU3U2w0FYsroDsqLlqB0d7kSxjhOS4Dg Radical Priorities]'' AK Press (2003) p. 26.</ref> El término socialismo libertario es usado por algunos socialistas para diferenciar su filosofía del [[socialismo de Estado]]<ref>Paul Zarembka. Transitions in Latin America and in Poland and Syria. Emerald Group Publishing, 2007. p. 25.</ref><ref>Guerin, Daniel. ''Anarchism: A Matter of Words'': "Some contemporary anarchists have tried to clear up the misunderstanding by adopting a more explicit term: they align themselves with libertarian socialism or communism." Faatz, Chris, ''Towards a Libertarian Socialism''.</ref> o por algunos como sinónimo del [[anarquismo social]].<ref name="Ostergaard 1991. p. 21"/><ref name="Noam Chomsky 2004, p. 739"/><ref>Ross, Dr. Jeffery Ian. ''Controlling State Crime'', Transaction Publishers (200) p. 400.</ref>
Sus partidarios afirman que se puede llegar a una sociedad basada en la libertad y la igualdad aboliendo las instituciones autoritarias, que controlan ciertos [[medios de producción]] y subordinan la mayoría a una clase hegemónica o élite política y económica.<ref>Mendes, Silva. ''Socialismo Libertário ou Anarchismo'' Vol. 1 (1896): "Society should be free through mankind's spontaneous federative affiliation to life, based on the community of land and tools of the trade; meaning: Anarchy will be equality by abolition of private property and liberty by abolition of authority".</ref> El socialismo libertario también constituye una tendencia de pensamiento que promueve la identificación, crítica y desmantelamiento real de la autoridad ilegítima en todos los aspectos de la vida.<ref>"Authority is defined in terms of the right to exercise social control (as explored in the "sociology of power") and the correlative duty to obey (as explred in the "philosophy of practical reason"). Anarchism is distinguished, philosophically, by its scepticism towards such moral relations – by its questioning of the claims made for such normative power – and, practically, by its challenge to those "authoritative" powers which cannot justify their claims and which are therefore deemed illegitimate or without moral foundation."[http://books.google.com.ec/books?id=kkj5i3CeGbQC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism'' by Paul McLaughlin. AshGate. 2007. pg. 1].</ref><ref name="iaf-ifa.org">"The [[International of Anarchist Federations|IAF - IFA]] fights for : the abolition of all forms of authority whether economical, political, social, religious, cultural or sexual."[http://www.iaf-ifa.org/principles/english.html "Principles of The [[International of Anarchist Federations]]"].</ref><ref>"Anarchism, then, really stands for the liberation of the human mind from the dominion of religion; the liberation of the human body from the dominion of property; liberation from the shackles and restraint of government. Anarchism stands for a social order based on the free grouping of individuals for the purpose of producing real social wealth; an order that will guarantee to every human being free access to the earth and full enjoyment of the necessities of life, according to individual desires, tastes, and inclinations." [[Emma Goldman]]. "What it Really Stands for Anarchy" in ''[[Anarchism and Other Essays]]''.</ref><ref>Individualist anarchist Benjamin Tucker defined anarchism as opposition to authority as follows "They found that they must turn either to the right or to the left, — follow either the path of Authority or the path of Liberty. Marx went one way; Warren and Proudhon the other. Thus were born State Socialism and Anarchism...Authority, takes many shapes, but, broadly speaking, her enemies divide themselves into three classes: first, those who abhor her both as a means and as an end of progress, opposing her openly, avowedly, sincerely, consistently, universally; second, those who profess to believe in her as a means of progress, but who accept her only so far as they think she will subserve their own selfish interests, denying her and her blessings to the rest of the world; third, those who distrust her as a means of progress, believing in her only as an end to be obtained by first trampling upon, violating, and outraging her. These three phases of opposition to Liberty are met in almost every sphere of thought and human activity. Good representatives of the first are seen in the Catholic Church and the Russian autocracy; of the second, in the Protestant Church and the Manchester school of politics and political economy; of the third, in the atheism of Gambetta and the socialism of Karl Marx." [[Benjamin Tucker]]. [http://www.theanarchistlibrary.org/HTML/Benjamin_Tucker__Individual_Liberty.html ''Individual Liberty.''].</ref><ref name="Ward 1966">{{cita web |url=http://www.panarchy.org/ward/organization.1966.html|apellido=Ward|nombre=Colin|año=1966|título=Anarchism as a Theory of Organization|fechaacceso=1 de marzo de 2010| urlarchivo= http://web.archive.org/web/20100325081119/http://www.panarchy.org/ward/organization.1966.html| fechaarchivo= 25 March 2010<!--Added by DASHBot-->}}</ref><ref>Anarchist historian [[George Woodcock]] report of [[Mikhail Bakunin]]'s anti-authoritarianism and shows opposition to both state and non-state forms of authority as follows: "All anarchists deny authority; many of them fight against it." (pg. 9)...Bakunin did not convert the League's central committee to his full program, but he did persuade them to accept a remarkably radical recommendation to the Berne Congress of September 1868, demanding economic equality and implicitly attacking authority in both Church and State".</ref><ref>{{cita libro |apellidos=Brown |nombre=L. Susan |capítulo=Anarchism as a Political Philosophy of Existential Individualism: Implications for Feminism |título=The Politics of Individualism: Liberalism, Liberal Feminism and Anarchism |editorial=Black Rose Books Ltd. Publishing |año= 2002 |página=106}}</ref>
| |||