Leyo

Para los comentarios urgentes utilice por favor esta página. ¡Gracias!

About structural molecules

Reply from here:
We can settle down this in another way.

1. We can place both kinds of images in the way wiki-en does it.
2. We can leave your images (which I disagree)
3. We can leave my images (which you disagree)
4. We can leave it to the Hutts;)

Me and my peers love the ball and sticks shapes because:

1. It's a fashion way to present them
2. You can have a dimensional point of view of the structure as it occur in space.
3. They look so nice.
4. Only a few people can actually read the structure, no matter the way the atoms are shown. I know this by personal experience.

GarciaGerry (discusión) ✍ 04:26 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

I suggest to options:

1. We re-add the structural formulas to the boxes and include the ball-and-stick models (thumb including a short description) into the text.
2. We place both images inside the box. I don't know if this is possible here in es-WP.

I would prefer the first option, but you can choose. --Leyo (discusión) 10:18 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

Hey man. Your questions and answers go on my discussion page, not here. And my answers and questions go here. This way You and I can know what the other have to say. :-) I transferred all essential data from Ligando quelato to Agente quelante and ask the librarians to make a fusion of both articles, because as you pointed out, there's no need to have separated articles of the same subject. Thanx.

If your question about the header message refers to the "Para los comentarios urgentes utilice por favor esta página. ¡Gracias!" message, It's OK. By the way, if my english sucks big time, please correct me.GarciaGerry (discusión) ✍ 15:55 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. As English is just my second foreign language, I will certainly not correct your writing. ;-)

As you are the only author of Agente quelante you can just add the content to Ligando quelato and merge the text. Then Agente quelante should be changed to a redirect.

What is your opinion on my two suggestions above?

--Leyo (discusión) 16:46 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

I answer your Questions here because I don't know any other way the system could let you know that there's a comment on your thread. And no, Ligando Quelato (LQ) is a little part of a bigger subject Agente quelante (AQ) and should not be kept aside. It's more like a subchapter. You cannot make the chapter (the main subject) part of a subchapter (the lesser part). If you write about pharmacokinetics you can´t leave out the parts that talk about absortion, distribution, metabolism and excretion to make articles about each and everyone of them. You need to put them as part of the main subject, pharmacokinetics in this case. There are other subjects that are more wider and extensive that really need more space and explanations in their own article as in Non-linear pharmacolinetics. That's the reason why I migrated all data in LQ to AQ. and this LQ lacks of it.GarciaGerry (discusión) ✍ 17:17 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

Yes, it is absolutely correct that you reply here. But I am also going to reply you here for the reasons I mentioned. You simply see my reply in your Watchlist.

You are right about the name of the article. I focussed on the procedure and the fact that your article is less old and you are the only author. It's done now anyway. :-)

What about my initial issue (the structural formulas)? You haven't replied on this yet. --Leyo (discusión) 18:11 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

How dou you like this?

Weeelll, I haven´t replied because my girlfriend and I were working out (not making out) the way to present the data. And we create this Ácido dimercaptosuccínico. As you can see, we present the two faces of the molecule. The ugly and flat only-boring-lines structure and the beautyful ball-and-stick structure. Both in the same box. By the way, we don't know how to do it, but we -simple pc user mortals-, can´t figure it out how to make an image where the molecules spin on its axe and make it more attractive to the sight. If you know a way to do it, please tell us and we will remove all 3Dimages to be replaced for the new ones. As you can already know, we are so much of an experts in computer magic. We like to make something like this spining molecule.

GarciaGerry (discusión) ✍ 18:39 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

The article looks nice, even though I did not really read the text. I have added interwikis and PubChem. I would suggest to exchange the upper structure with the simple black&white structure that is used in the other wikipedias. Have you ever thought how it looks if the article is printed, especially in a non-color print? I think the blue background is not ideal for this reason. Transparency is the best option for the background in my opinion.

Concerning 3D spinning molecules: Do you think about something like Image:3-methyl-2-buten-1-ol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif? I don't know how to create them. You may ask User:Benjah-bmm27. He contributed hundreds of chemical structures to Commons. --Leyo (discusión) 19:27 20 mar 2008 (UTC)

What's your nationality anyway? And the reason you are collaborating in a wiki in spanish? Are you a chemist or physician? There´s nothing about you on your Talk Page. Just curious. GarciaGerry (discusión) ✍ 05:32 21 mar 2008 (UTC)

For an answer to your first two questions, just look at my user page and click the right links under «Otros idiomas». ;-) And the reply to the last is «químico ambiental». --Leyo (discusión) 01:55 23 mar 2008 (UTC)

Here

Dado tu interés en fármacos, te recomiendo que entres a este enlace para que apoyes el proyecto con tus conocimientos. I wrote in spanish so you can practice.GarciaGerry (discusión) 06:26 26 mar 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation and the Spanish practise. ;-) However, I have my priorities in other projects (see this tool and my user page). --Leyo (discusión) 20:43 27 mar 2008 (UTC)

Re:Helvetica Chimica Acta

Hallo Leyo, sag mal, wie kommst du ueberhaupt auf mich?? ;-P Zu deiner Frage: Jain. Deine Frage lauetet Ist es in der spanischen Wikipedia üblich, Kategorien in Artikel einzufügen, die (noch) gar nicht existieren. Der Schuessel dabei ist fuer mich der noch. Wenn der Verfasser vom Artikel es vorhat, das eine Thema auszubauen, und anschliessend eine Kategorie dafuer einzufuegen, dann finde ich es okay. Ansonsten macht's wenig Sinn, weil dieser Artikel im Limbo bis auf Weiteres haengen kann (und der Artikel nicht mehr unter diesem Verzeichnis zu finden ist, und damit der Wartung entgeht). Wenn ich auf so etwas stosse, dann fuege ich zumindest eine existierende Kategorie ein (leider meistens allgemeiner wie in diesem Fall, und zwar, Chemie und Zeitschriften). Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir helfen, schoene Gruesse aus USA, poco a poco toma y daca 00:46 5 ago 2008 (UTC) PD: Was ist ueblich in der Deutschen Wiki?

Um die Diskussion nicht zu verzetteln, schreibe ich dir hier zurück (dafür gibt's ja die Beobachtungsliste). In de-WP werden nur existierende Kategorien in Artikel eingefügt. Wenn das Anlegen einer Kategorie (noch) nicht sinnvoll ist, so wird die Oberkategorie eingefügt. --Leyo (discusión) 08:37 5 ago 2008 (UTC)

Verstanden, macht ihr was Aehnliches mit den roten Links? Darf man viele einfuegen?, Gruesse, poco a poco toma y daca 13:19 5 ago 2008 (UTC)

Ich verstehe die Frage nicht ganz. In de-WP werden keine “roten” Kategorien eingefügt. Bei Wikilinks auf auf Artikel ist das natürlich anders. --Leyo (discusión) 15:42 5 ago 2008 (UTC)

Migración a la extensión Babel

Español

Estimado Leyo, actualmente Wikipedia en español se encuentra en proceso de migración al uso exclusivo de la Extensión Babel como fuente para informar sobre el dominio de idiomas de los usuarios. Tu página de usuario aún no ha sido actualizada. Por favor, realiza el cambio siguiendo las indicaciones que encontrarás en Wikipedia:Babel, ya sea reemplazando las plantillas o categorías que actualmente estés utilizando. Ten en cuenta que estas serán borradas y reemplazadas por las nuevas.

Nota: Éste es un aviso automático generado por un bot. Para más información puedes ponerte en contacto con su operador.

English

Dear Leyo, Wikipedia in Spanish is currently migrating to Babel as the only source for informing users about Wikipedians by languages. Your user page has not yet been updated. Please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Babel, to replace the templates or categories you are currently using. Please note these will be deleted and replaced by the new ones.

Note: This notice has been generated by a bot. For further information, please contact its operator.