Categoría discusión:Lenguas kartvelianas
Último comentario: hace 8 años por Jaqeli en el tema more req
more req
editarUsuario:Lin linao Can you please also move this category per Lenguas kartvelianas? Jaqeli (discusión) 17:13 24 jul 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. What do you think, Davius? (No estoy seguro. ¿Qué opinas, Davius?) Lin linao ¿dime? 05:07 26 jul 2015 (UTC)
- The two terms are completely equivalent terms. There is no ambiguity in identifying Karvelian with "South Caucasian". Indeed, for the general reader, maybe it is a little more descriptive the term "South Caucassian" (I understand that the main motivation for using "Kartvelian" is that there is some evidence that Northeast and Northwest Caucassian are related but not "South Caucassian", so to give a different name to the non-related South Caucassian group seems interesting to some linguists). I am not sure about to move the categroy, --Davius (discusión) 06:32 26 jul 2015 (UTC)
- Usuario:Lin linao Usuario:Davius South Caucasian is now an obsolete term and more linguistic scolarship uses Kartvelian as the language family is not related to North Caucasian language families so better if we move it. Jaqeli (discusión) 20:36 27 jul 2015 (UTC)
- Usuario:Lin linao Will you move it? It makes no sense having main article with different category name. Jaqeli (discusión) 17:08 14 ago 2015 (UTC)
- Usuario:Lin linao Usuario:Davius South Caucasian is now an obsolete term and more linguistic scolarship uses Kartvelian as the language family is not related to North Caucasian language families so better if we move it. Jaqeli (discusión) 20:36 27 jul 2015 (UTC)
- The two terms are completely equivalent terms. There is no ambiguity in identifying Karvelian with "South Caucasian". Indeed, for the general reader, maybe it is a little more descriptive the term "South Caucassian" (I understand that the main motivation for using "Kartvelian" is that there is some evidence that Northeast and Northwest Caucassian are related but not "South Caucassian", so to give a different name to the non-related South Caucassian group seems interesting to some linguists). I am not sure about to move the categroy, --Davius (discusión) 06:32 26 jul 2015 (UTC)